A stupid question, but hopefully obvious to someone else...
Category None
Is it possible to have a firewall, that sees two incoming hostnames, example site1.acme.com and site2.acme.com and redirect all traffic on all ports for site1 to 192.168.1.1 for all traffic on all ports to 192.168.1.2 for site 2?
Can any firewalls do this? Trying to save myself purchasing anymore static ips.
Is it possible to have a firewall, that sees two incoming hostnames, example site1.acme.com and site2.acme.com and redirect all traffic on all ports for site1 to 192.168.1.1 for all traffic on all ports to 192.168.1.2 for site 2?
Can any firewalls do this? Trying to save myself purchasing anymore static ips.
Comments
Posted by Volker Weber At 04:42:30 PM On 04/29/2005 | - Website - |
It depends on the product. Higher end firewalls can look deeper into the packet than the destination address, and can make decisions based on protocol level data (like the request server name in the http packet).
Of course, those firewalls tend to be more exensive than getting another static ip would be.
Posted by Andrew Pollack At 05:03:13 PM On 04/29/2005 | - Website - |
Apache has reverse proxy capabilities and you will find a lot of stuff when searching for reverse proxy or load balancing on Google.
Hth
Posted by Stephan H. Wissel At 02:38:58 AM On 05/01/2005 | - Website - |
Short answer for redirection of HTTP requests only: Yes, any reverse proxy / load balancer like Squid or Pound (http://www.apsis.ch/pound) will do.
Short answer for redirection of HTTPS requests: That depends on the product used. Pound has limited support for that.
If you're interested in a longer, more in-depth answer why it's not possible to redirect any other traffic than HTTP, let me know
-Stefan
Posted by Stefan Rubner At 04:48:15 AM On 05/02/2005 | - Website - |