CMSWatch posts a response to the "slowly phasing out" Domino article.
Category CMSWatch Domino
I much prefer the tone to this article, than the tone taken by the original author in the comments of my blog posting.
It may just be me, but couldn't this statement be said for any platform/application?
Slightly modified
1) They are enhancing their usage of XYXYX platform
2) They plan to move away from XYXYX platform, so aren't investing in it anymore, but are still using it until they no longer need it.
3) Those that are pro-actively replacing XYXYX platform with alternatives.
I much prefer the tone to this article, than the tone taken by the original author in the comments of my blog posting.
It may just be me, but couldn't this statement be said for any platform/application?
1) Those actively enhancing existing implementations across the board.
2) Those supporting their existing implementations, but not advancing them much, and retiring applications as they no longer serve their original purpose (usually over the course of many years).
3) Those pro-actively replacing Lotus/Domino collaboration and KM applications with various alternatives (also a multi-year ambition).
Slightly modified
1) They are enhancing their usage of XYXYX platform
2) They plan to move away from XYXYX platform, so aren't investing in it anymore, but are still using it until they no longer need it.
3) Those that are pro-actively replacing XYXYX platform with alternatives.
| Permalink | 
